Assessment of:

Bureau of General and Legal Affairs

Auditee(s):

Mr.L.Edy K, Mr.Kadri, Mr.Wiyata, and Team

Audit trails and sources of evidence:

  • Management Review
  • Quality Target
  • Manual Quality BUK
  • Gap Analysis of Human Resources BUK
  • List of Name of Structural Officers
  • Leaflet for lecturer and employees’ development
  • Training Certificate
  • BUK’s Program
  • Work Plan of Employees Need in 2012
  • Manual Proscedure of Technical Training
  • Fire Extinguisher Maintenance at UB
  • Program of Mechanical Technicians (Genset)
  • Manual Procedure of Building Maintenance
  • Manual Procedure of Procurement
  • The Evaluation of Partner Assessment
  • Program of Security Unit
  • Loss report

Evaluation and conclusions:

The activity related to BAUK activities including monitoring and reporting was observed to be in order as required by company procedure.Basis the records reviewed for operation (general, human resources and facilities), all relevant processes assessed were found satisfactorily implemented to support the requirements of the company’s procedure. Based on sample taken, no negative point was noted.

Performance of BAUK department was monitored through quality objectives which is properly maintained and no non conformity finding to be reported however a note were given as below:

Care should be taken to completedappropriate data regarding competency gap analysis based on experience records to demonstrate conformity with the requirements

Consideration could be taken to established training program documentation based on activities program to ensure delivered training realization in accordance with planned arrangement

Consideration could be taken toincluded fuel inspection (solar) for generator and CCTV equipments in maintenance program

Questionnaire evaluation as supplier performance measurement was reported, analyse appropriate for data evaluation alreadydefinedhowevercare should be taken to provide information records of follow up for reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken

Consideration could be taken to review manual procedure regarding conducted of “education-training” (DIKLAT) to ensure clearly defined evaluate the effectiveness of the action taken that type of delivered of training (awareness or improve the competency of skill)

Care should be taken to review quality objective of security process that performance definition should be measurable